27 firms just launched a court for AI agent disputes. The five standards underneath it still can't agree.
Internet Court wants to be the dispute layer for AI commerce. It's built on ERC-7710 delegations and five competing standards that weren't designed to talk to each other.
CryptoVibe Desk · ai-agents · ethereum · account-abstraction
- →Genlayer Foundation launched Internet Court, a 27-firm consortium including OKX, MetaMask, and Matter Labs, built to handle disputes, escrow, and payments between AI agents.
- →The protocol uses ERC-7710 delegations to define machine-speed contracts between agents, but it must bridge five competing standards that its own member companies built and never aligned.
- →Watch for whether the consortium can produce a joint specification connecting x402, A2A, and ERC-7710. Without convergence at the substrate layer, the dispute layer is theoretical.
- ERC-7710 → A standard that lets one Ethereum wallet grant specific, limited permissions to an AI agent, so the agent can spend funds on the user's behalf without holding full control of the wallet.
- x402 → A payment protocol that lets AI agents pay for services automatically using the same HTTP format a browser uses to load a webpage.
- ERC-8004 → A proposed Ethereum standard for giving AI agents a verifiable on-chain identity, so other agents and contracts can confirm who they are dealing with.
- A2A (Agent-to-Agent) → Google's protocol for letting AI agents communicate with each other across different systems, competing with the crypto-native standards in this space.
AI agents are already transacting. The dispute layer just launched.
Genlayer Foundation introduced Internet Court this week, a 27-firm consortium handling disputes, escrow, and payments between AI agents. OKX, MetaMask, and Matter Labs are among the backers, per CoinDesk. It runs on MetaMask's Smart Accounts Kit: ERC-7710 delegations and the x402 Facilitator.
The mechanism makes sense. ERC-7710 lets an agent hold a scoped, revocable delegation from a user wallet. When agent A pays agent B, the delegation defines the terms. If a payment fails, Internet Court arbitrates against those terms. Machine-speed contracts, machine-speed resolution.
The problem sits one layer down. Five standards are competing for the AI commerce layer: Coinbase's x402 for payments, ERC-8004 for agent identity, Google's A2A for interoperability, ERC-7710 and MetaMask's x402 Facilitator for delegation and routing.
Internet Court promises to bridge all of them. That's not dispute resolution. That's a standards convergence problem, and those don't resolve by adding more layers.
This is a coordination failure packaged as infrastructure. Some of the 27 consortium members built the competing standards in the first place: Coinbase built x402, Google built A2A, MetaMask built ERC-7710. None were designed to talk to each other.
If you're building AI agents that move money, your bag is already on the table: pick one standard and hope the others die quietly.
The engineering parallel is backpressure. You can build a queue to manage it, but if upstream systems emit incompatible message formats, the queue just collects garbage faster. Internet Court is the queue. The upstream problem is still open.
What the consortium gets right: it names the problem. AI agent commerce needs contractual infrastructure. Humans built contract law and courts over centuries. Agents need equivalent rails in months, not decades. Twenty-seven firms with enough institutional weight could push standards convergence if they actually want to.
What it gets wrong: the dispute layer assumes a shared substrate that doesn't exist yet. You can't adjudicate a payment disagreement if the two agents ran on different protocols and can't agree on what was owed.
Read the ERC-7710 spec, not the press release. The delegation scoping is the mechanism that either makes this real or falls apart on first contact.
Internet Court's first live dispute will reveal that the 27-firm consortium built the courtroom before writing the contract law. ERC-7710 is what makes the arbitration mechanism run, and it has not been defined against x402, A2A, or ERC-8004. That's not a launch problem. That's a structural one.
If Coinbase, Google, and MetaMask don't publish a joint specification connecting x402, A2A, and ERC-7710 within six months, the consortium's 27 firms are almost certainly building toward fragmentation, not convergence.
Primary links and supporting reads used by the desk for this story.
Forward this.
