BTC$76,816-1.49%·
ETH$2,245-0.87%·
BNB$697.21-1.89%·
XRP$1.24-1.10%·
SOL$91.65-3.09%·
TRX$0.3182+1.60%·
HYPE$83.89-4.63%·
ZEC$1,175-4.65%·
DOGE$0.0735-2.58%·
XMR$598.17+0.38%·
WBT$73.78-1.42%·
LEO$9.38-0.12%·BTC$76,816-1.49%·ETH$2,245-0.87%·BNB$697.21-1.89%·XRP$1.24-1.10%·SOL$91.65-3.09%·TRX$0.3182+1.60%·HYPE$83.89-4.63%·ZEC$1,175-4.65%·DOGE$0.0735-2.58%·XMR$598.17+0.38%·WBT$73.78-1.42%·LEO$9.38-0.12%·
This page covers our editorial process: how we source stories, how we verify facts, how we handle corrections, and the role AI tools play in our workflow. We publish it because readers deserve to know, and because crypto media has burned enough trust that "just trust us" is not a standard.
sponsored. The editorial text about a sponsored project is still written by our desk; the sponsor has no input on the content.CryptoVibe uses AI tools in its editorial process. We use them for research synthesis, drafting, fact-extraction from primary documents, and style-consistency checks. This is the same class of tools many modern newsrooms have adopted, and we think you're better served by us being direct about it than by pretending otherwise.
What AI does in our process: generates first drafts against verified facts supplied by editors; pattern-matches across sources; accelerates the turnaround between breaking news and a publishable brief; enforces our voice and format rules mechanically so humans can focus on the story.
What AI does not do: decide what gets published; invent numbers or sources; fabricate quotes; conduct interviews; write under a byline without editorial review.
Every article is reviewed by a human editor before publication. That human verifies the facts, reads the prose, and signs off on the piece before it ships. No article reaches the site without that step. If we ever change that policy, this page will say so.
Our bylines represent editorial voices on specific beats. Each byline has a consistent perspective, register, and area of expertise. That is the same model used by any publication that has house styles, pseudonymous columnists, or consistent section voices. What is different is that we are open about the role AI plays in producing the prose under those bylines.
If we get a fact wrong, we fix it. Substantive corrections are logged at the bottom of the article with a date and what changed. We do not silently edit published pieces. If a correction materially changes the thesis, we link the updated piece from the original and keep the original accessible.
To request a correction: [email protected]. Include the article URL, the specific claim you're flagging, and a source for the correct information.
Primary sources only. We cite SEC filings, company blog posts, on-chain data (Etherscan, Dune, rwa.xyz), court documents, and named statements from named people. We do not attribute claims to "sources familiar with the matter" or "people close to the company" without naming them.
We link out to primary sources in article bodies when space allows, and automated articles include a source box from the underlying Scout brief below the story. For numbers and on-chain data, assume the figure is verifiable at the linked source as of the article's publication timestamp.
Our writers may hold BTC, ETH, stablecoins, and a diversified basket of well-known tokens. They do not hold meaningful positions in small-cap, pre-launch, or pre-announcement assets they cover. If a story involves a position one of our writers holds, the disclosure appears at the bottom of the article.
CryptoVibe as a company does not trade on reporting. We accept Gem Radar sponsorships (labeled) and newsletter ads (labeled). We do not take equity, tokens, or paid advisory relationships from projects in exchange for coverage.
If something on this page is unclear or you think we're falling short of it: [email protected]. We will answer.